It
goes without saying how much I appreciate the positive reception
whenever I
release new music. It's a driving motivator
that encourages me to keep making music, so thank you all for your kind
words. The feedback that stands out
most, however, are the questions. When my music piques the interest
fellow musicians wanting to know more about my process, I humbly feel
as though I must be doing something right.
The
main preparatory step in the recording of these covers was, of course,
critical listening of the
originals. I put on reference headphones and focused my ears on every
single instrument, vocal part, and effect, one at a time. Take the kick
drum, for example —
I'd listen to it very closely to figure out what kind of kick it was,
and which of
my many virtual instrument libraries would be most likely to have kicks
that
match the closest. I'd then load those libraries and audition the
kick drums until I found one I liked best.
Once
I found the right kick drum sound, I'd tweak the sound with
tuning, EQ, and transient shaping, or perhaps layer it with other
sounds. (Most of the snares in these songs are layered from two to four
sounds.) Then I'd listen to the reverb
to distinguish what kind of reverb it is (hall, room, plate, etc.) and
adust the parameters of the reverb (size, length, diffusion, color,
imaging, etc.) until I was able to approximate the general sound.
The
process was the same for the rest of the instruments. I'd critically
listen to
the basses, guitars, synths, and everything else, audition my virtual
instrument libraries, and figure out how to best replicate the
instruments in the original recordings. The bass on "I Wanna Dance with
Somebody" for example, is a sound I created by layering a bass guitar
with a sample library and a soft synth.
Software-based
synthesizers were crucial to this project because getting the right
sound required synth programming. I'd start with a preset that
got me in the general ballpark, and then edit LFOs, envelopes, filters,
and effects until I got the kind of sound I wanted.
I
didn't obsess over matching sounds or mixes exactly because a cover
song doesn't have to be a sonic clone of the original. If you recreate
a sonic clone of a song that's been out for 35-40 years, the new
version won't have anything refreshing to offer the listeners' ears.
What
I personally feel is most refreshing about these songs is hearing them
sung by people who could feel and deliver the vibe and energy of the
original
vocalists. Dan Tutsch really dug in to find that Bill Medley gusto.
Abby Kramer, as we all know, turns every song she touches into gold.
Sydney Burris recaptured the sweetness of the original Jets vocal
beyond expectation. Aaron J Robinson beautifully internalized my
updated arrangement of the Chicago ballad. And I'm positive Whitney
Houston would be very proud of Josie Day for having put her heart and
soul into her song.
Spotify Fixing to "Reverse-Robin-Hood" Independent Artists December 4, 2023
As
the story goes, Robin Hood robbed from the rich and gave to the poor.
His ethics were arguably controversial, but now imagine what his
literary
reputation would be like if he'd have robbed from the poor to give to
the rich.
Spotify
recently announced that, starting in January of 2024, any song that
receives less than 1,000 streams per year will have its
earned royalties stripped away from the artist and placed in a pool to
be redistributed
to Spotify's more popular artists.
This
is major news because the majority of artists on Spotify's platform are
not household names. They're independent, local bands and musicians
like me. According
to reports, two-thirds of Spotify's entire music catalog receives less
than
1,000 plays a year. This
new strategy will redirect tens of millions of dollars in
annual royalties
from those lesser-known artists to their more popular artists, which
includes mainstream artists like Rihanna, Drake and Taylor Swift.
Needless
to say, the major record labels and publishers who represent those
mainstream artists gave their thumbs up.
I
have over 50 tracks on Spotify. I receive over a thousand streams per
year, but cumulatively, not per song. Therefore 100% of my Spotify
revenue from all 50+ songs will be taken away from me.
One
can argue it's only a loss of a few dollars a year and therefore no big
deal, but
to me it's not about the money — it's about the principle. I have
nothing against Taylor Swift, but she's not the one putting hundreds of
hours of hard work and
thousands of dollars into my
productions. I am. For
Spotify to freely give
her my modest but justly-earned compensation because she's more popular
than me is wrong on so many levels.
After the 1st of the
year, I'm going to wait for a short time to see if Spotify comes under
enough pressure to reverse or modify their decision. If they don't,
then I will
have to remove all of my
music from the platform. This won't be fun because Spotify, with over
500 million active users and 225 million subscribers, is the world's
largest streaming music platform. I'll lose a major medium of exposure.
But every artist who stays on Spotify faces this moral dilemma:
If you don't get 1,000
streams per song, you'll be selling yourself out by letting Spotify and
their preferentially-treated artists take 100% of the profits from your
hard work. If you do get 1,000 or more streams per song, you'll become
one
of those preferentially-treated artists receiving royalties that were
earned by, and stripped away from, your fellow hard-working,
independent artists.
New EP Is Out
Two Weeks Ahead of Release! December 1, 2023
How the Music
Modernization Act Set Song Licensing Back
Over 100 Years November 30, 2023
To
make song royalty disbursements and licensing more streamlined and
efficient for the modern age, the Music Modernization Act (MMA) was
signed into law in 2018. The Act established the Mechanical
Licensing Collective (MLC) whose purpose is to issue blanket licenses
to digital music providers, such as Spotify and YouTube, allowing them
to stream music. These providers report song plays to the
MLC, and the MLC then distributes royalties to the appropriate artist
or copyright holder.
Prior
to the MLC's blanket licensing which started January 1, 2021, if you
recorded a cover song and wanted to post it on your
website
for people to play, you would purchase a digital streaming
license from one of the major song licensers. It was an easy process —
you simply paid for as many plays as you expected to receive, and if
you received more, you relicensed the song.
The
MMA and MLC, however, have created a frustrating
paradox:
A
blanket license from the MLC is now the only practical means of
securing permission to stream cover songs, and only
major digital music providers like Spotify and YouTube can get a
blanket license. The channels
for independent musicians to license cover songs for
streaming have been closed. If an independent
musician wants to
stream songs from their website, they're now left with two options:
1.
Submit their song to a digital distributor who will distribute it to
digital music providers licensed by the MLC, and then embed a player
from one of those providers on their website.
2. Personally contact the publisher of the song and request permission
or negotiate a fee.
Yes,
you read that 2nd option correctly — if an artist wants to license a
cover song
for streaming on their website or any other smaller platform not
covered by an MLC blanket license, they literally have to
contact
the publisher who holds the copyright to the song and request
permission or negotiate a licensing fee. This is exactly how cover
songs
were authorized for distribution prior
to the advent of mechanical
licenses in 1909!
A
rep from one
major licensing company advised me that when it comes to contacting
publishers for streaming permission, not to expect results. Publishers
apparently now count on
all their streaming royalties to come through the MLC and don't bother
dealing with or responding to individual requests for streaming
licenses — not even from major licensing companies.
The
Harry Fox Agency still offers and issues digital streaming
licenses through their licensing service Songfile, but apparently only
for songs copyrighted by their affiliated publishers. [And their
database seems to be plagued with mismatched song information which
could inadvertently steer artists toward licensing the wrong songs.]
In
fairness to the MMA, most artists today embed players from major
platforms like Spotify and Apple Music, so it's not an issue for them.
I could go that route since most of my music is on those platforms, and
I'd even earn a few cents in royalties, but I personally don't care for
their embedded players as they typically employ modal overlays, ads, or
other annoyances. It's always been my preference to present my music in
uninterrupted form for the maximum benefit of the listener. For that
reason, licensing streams was always my preferred strategy for cover
songs. I hope someday digital streaming licensing will come back to us
independent musicians, but I think it's safe to assume that ship has
sailed.
Why Some
Musicians Have to Be Told to Smile October 6, 2023
Ever
wonder why the accordion player sometimes seems to stare into
space or look so solemn? It could be that they're bored, but
the more likely reason is that they're concentrating.
Every
musician possesses a finite amount of musical brainpower. How much they
possess is determined by how talented they are, and how
much of it they allocate to performing varies on several factors.
Below
is a graphic showing how an experienced, accordion-playing bandleader
may allocate their brainpower during a typical performance. They don't
use all their brainpower for performing because they don't need to.
Through years of practice and performing, a lot of what they do has
become second nature. They don't have to think about every note they're
playing or singing because muscle memory is doing a lot of the heavy
lifting. So while they are performing,
a percentage of their mind is free for other tasks...
like smiling:
But
stressors can affect with bandleader's concentration, forcing him
to allocate more of it to performing.
Stressors can
include being unable to hear well due to poor acoustics or inept sound
technicians, having to play ahead or behind the drummer to prevent him
from dragging or rushing the tempo, performing new material, and
adapting their repertoire and arrangements to
gel with new musicians. These kinds of stressors leave the bandleader significantly less
brainpowerfor other tasks:
Like a typical polka
bandleader, I have good days and bad days. On a good day, the drummer
will lock onto my tempo, allowing me to relax and enjoy playing instead
of continually having to hold him back or push him forward. On a good
day, I'll hear myself clearly instead of having to allocate brainpower
to deciphering what notes I'm playing or singing. Good days are fun,
and they're what
make being a polka bandleader worth all the hard work.
But sometimes gigs can be
stressful, and when they are, it leads to mental exhaustion. Notice how
crowded that second graphic is. After a four-hour gig under such
conditions, I am completely spent. When I get home, I can't do anything
that requires thinking because my brain is toast. I need a good night's
sleep to recharge.
Some
bandleaders have committed smiling to muscle memory so
that they automatically do it without thinking. This is a good skill to
have because smiling and concentrating don't go hand-in-hand.
So the next time you see
a bandleader looking so serious and solemn, it's OK to say, "Hey!
Smile!" Bandleaders actually enjoy the lighthearted banter. But to put
yourself in their shoes, try maintaining an authentic smile while
you're running multiplication tables in your head as you're weaving
your way through heavy traffic on the freeway while trying to follow a
football game on the radio. It's not as easy as it sounds.
A Sneak Peek
Into That One Person's Odd Social Media Behavior August 31, 2023
Have
you noticed that people who continually post messages of love, empathy,
and tolerance on social media are often the most judgmental,
intolerant, and bitter people in real life? Ever wonder why that is?
Last year when I wrote an article explaining why I don't use social
media, I touched on a connection between social media and mental
health. It generated some feedback, and since the topic of social media
and narcissistic personality disorder came up in recent conversation in
a discussion forum to which I belong, I decided to use my blog to shed
more light on why we notice some social media users failing to live by
the mantras they preach.
Below is a graphic showing how emotionally healthy people see the world
around them. They generally see people as reflections of themselves —
mostly good-natured and harmless. Friendships and relationships come
naturally.
People with NPD have a very fragile ego, and their Kryptonite is
criticism. Narcissists cannot handle the feeling of being judged or
deemed wrong. It doesn't take much for a narcissist's mind to perceive
a benign, harmless comment as a hostile, personal attack. To shield
themselves from this perceived hostility, narcissists are very slow to
trust anyone. In extreme
cases they may even choose to live in relative isolation.
Since a narcissist lives in constant fear of being judged, their
threshold of tolerance for other people's behavior toward them is
unrealistically low, as shown by the extremely thin friend zone in the
graphic above. Very few people in a narcissist's life will ever make it
into their friend zone, and if they do, it's usually just for a short
period of time. As long as the person is in agreement with how the
narcissist thinks, the narcissist will keep that person in their friend
zone. But when the person says anything that challenges or critiques
the narcissist's way of thinking, which is guaranteed to happen at some
point, the narcissist will perceive it as an attack, snap, and cast
that person into their foe zone. This is why narcissists' friendships
and relationships are often short-lived and come to sudden, dramatic
ends.
The irony about NPD is that narcissists believe they possess a superior
sense of tolerance and empathy which makes them a perfect, lovable
friend — it's everyone else who's narcissistic, judgmental, apathetic,
shallow, and untrustworthy. The narcissist believes the size of their
friend zone is normal and their perception of what's required to be
their friend is also normal. They're unhappy because it seems like
everyone in the world is apparently too shallow, intolerant, and
judgmental to be their friend.
But the disorder is the cause of the narcissist's unhappiness because
it warps their perception of people. There's nothing wrong with 99% of
the people in the narcissist's foe zone – they're adequately kind and
compassionate. The narcissist's fear of criticism, however, causes them
to vet everyone around them with prejudice and be quick to cast them
off as foes for impractical, inconsequential reasons. This is what
gives the narcissist their judgemental, apathetic, intolerant nature,
which they project onto everyone around them.
The key to a narcissist finding happiness and contentment is rebuilding
their self-esteem to where criticism no longer affects them. Then
they'll be able to see and accept people as most of them truly are:
well-intentioned and harmless. A narcissist is never truly reformed
until their victim mindset of "I've
been hurt by so many people" changes to "I now understand why I let myself feel
hurt by so many people."
Their friend zone will widen to a normal state, and the reformed
narcissist will then be able to function normally and happily in the
world.
So where does social media come into play?
In the real world, narcissists can't hide their intolerant, judgmental
nature. Everyone in their life eventually sees who they're dealing
with. This leads to discord which the narcissist internalizes as
criticism. All this discord/criticism makes the real world seem like a
hostile place to a narcissist.
Social
media, however, gives the
narcissist a place to go where they can do something they can't do in
real life: control what everyone sees and says. They can create a
facade to mask their vulnerability, and they can delete anyone or
anything that poses a threat to their ego.
An emotionally-healthy person (above) does not feel threatened by
people, so they are accepting of them. Their social media world mirrors
their real world.
A narcissist (below) sees people as potential threats. Narcissists, due
to their belief they possess superior tolerance and empathy, believe
their friend zone is the behavioral standard by which everyone ought to
conform. Those who do not conform are considered inferior and are
summarily blocked/banned.
As we've all noticed, narcissists are known for filling up their social
media pages with positive affirmations, wishes of love and
self-empowerment, tips for living well, and inspirational quotes. They
do this to "generate supply," which is a clinical term that roughly
translates to "fish for validation." Every compliment they receive acts
like a Band-Aid which gives them temporary relief from their low
self-esteem. But these Band-Aids don't actually fix their self-esteem,
which is
why narcissists who use social media as a crutch in lieu of seeking
professional help never change.
Needless
to say, people who post daily messages of love, inspiration,
and wisdom are not all narcissists. [I hardly think the Dalai Lama is a
narcissist.] But everyone knows at least one person who incessantly
posts about the importance of being strong, tolerant, and
understanding, yet, when someone challenges one little thing they say
or do, they fly off the handle with a volatile, emotional tirade,
completely contradicting all the uplifting messages they've been
posting. They may even shut down and disappear from social media for a
few days to piece their emotions back together.
And then they go right back to posting how important it is for people
to be strong, tolerant, and understanding.
While it may seem fun to push a narcissist's buttons and watch them
flip their lid, I recommend you don't do that. NPD is a legitimate
mental
health condition. People with NPD are more prone to substance abuse,
and one of the effects of NPD can be debilitating depression. Substance
abuse and
depression can be a life-threatening concoction. You can't gauge the
seriousness of one's depression by what they post on the internet.
One last word of advice: If you find yourself debating a narcissist in
an internet discussion forum, stop. There's no point. Just like a bad
driver never misses their exit, a narcissist never loses an argument.
For Polka
Bandleaders, Oktoberfest is Not All Fun and Games August 30, 2023
Oktoberfest
is what I consider to be a polka musician's "Black Friday" because
there's always more than enough work to go around. On Saturdays during
the peak Oktoberfest season from early September to early October, the
number of venues and events wanting live polka music always exceeds the
supply of bands.
For polka musicians, this is a wonderful situation, but for
bandleaders, booking these events and hiring thier musicians can feel
like manning the operator's desk at Grand Central Station.
When it comes to booking bands for Oktoberfest, the early bird gets the
worm. Events that book a year in advance will get their choice of
bands, and the leaders of those bands will get their choice of
musicians. But most Oktoberfest inquires come in much later, usually in
August, and that's when things get hairy.
When an inquiry for an event comes in, a bandleader will call around to
his preferred musicians to find out who is available to play. This is
when the bandleader starts putting together a list of who is available
and who isn't. But around Oktoberfest, it rarely ends there. A typical
scenario goes like this:
While the bandleader is checking musician availability for this event,
a second event inquires about live music for the same day. By default
the bandleader will give priority to the first inquiry that comes in,
so he gives both events a quote and first event a 24-hour window to
accept or reject it. But, before the first event can even respond, one
of the musicians informs the bandleader that another band called to
inquire about booking him for another event, so he wouldn't know his
availablity until later that day or tomorrow. While the bandleader is
busy reassessing musician availability for the first event, a third
event inquiry rolls in and the process repeats.
Scenarios like this are common during Oktoberfest, especially for the
busiest Saturdays when a band may receive up to ten inquiries for the
same date. It exemplifies how cut-throat the Oktoberfest season is. The
availability of bands and musicians can change literally from one hour
to the next. When you play music for a living, you have to stay on top
of Oktoberfest inquiries and musician availability, and that requires
fast and furious communication by phone, text, and email. But nothing
is guaranteed because when it comes right down to it, band and musician
availability is determined mostly by one thing: the timing of the
inquiry. After that, it's just pure luck.
When I am able to take a late booking for Oktoberfest, I prompt the
venue to sign the contract quickly. I'm sure it comes off like a cheesy
sales pitch, but it's not. There's a reason. Polka musicians are free
agents. They are free to take the first confirmed gig that comes their
way. With the demand for polka musicians being so high during
Oktoberfest, the sooner a bandleader can confirm a gig with a contract,
the sooner he can lock in his band's preferred musicians for that gig.
A delay in signing the contract can result in the bandleader having to
downsize his band because one of his musicians was poached by another
band for another event.
When venues book late, sometimes luck can be on their side:
A couple weeks ago, my band received an inquiry for a Saturday
Oktoberfest event. Less than an hour later, a second inquiry came in
for the same Saturday. I provided price quotes to both venues, but
informed them that the first venue had a 24-hour window to commit to
booking us before we'd become fair game for the second venue. The first
venue did not commit, which gave the second venue a shot at booking us.
But they, too, did not commit. Both venues expressed a lot of interest,
but even after several days went by, neither had pulled the trigger.
Although neither venue was obligated to hire us, both were taking a big
risk because a third venue could have came along at any time and sniped
us for that date. It's a miracle that didn't happen. [The second venue
finally did commit to hiring us.]
It's "Legacy
Band" Not "Tribute Band" August 18, 2023
Almost
everywhere
the Steve Meisner Legacy Band has performed, we've been inadvertently
advertised as the Steve Meisner Tribute
Band. While we understand this advertising has had the best of
intentions,
there is a distinct difference between a legacy band and a tribute band
that needs to be
clarified.
A
tribute band is a band whose only goal is to sound like, look like, and
play nothing but the music of another band. Tribute bands exist all
over the world, mimicking everyone from Abba to Zepplin. The musicians
in tribute bands usually have no association or affiliation with the
band they're mimicking.
The
Steve Meisner Legacy Band is not a tribute band because we are made up
of the
band's actual members, and although we perform a good number of songs
that Steve was known for playing, each guest
accordionist brings their own style and repertoire to each
performance. The Steve
Meisner Legacy Band doesn't try to mimic Steve Meisner, nor would we
ever use his name to secure new gigs. We're merely honoring him by
fulfilling his contracts, and, at the request of a handful of venues
that were special to Steve and his band, we may maintain a few of his
annual, longstanding performances.
New Spy App From
the Parent Company of Facebook July 8, 2023
Meta's
new app Threads, which is designed to compete with Twitter, garnered 70
million subscribers within the first 48 hours of its launch. Out
of curiosity, I'd be interested to know how many of those first 70
million bothered to read the app's privacy policy, which — for the
purposes of
advertising, analytics, app personalization, app functionality, and
other undisclosed purposes — allows for the collection of the
following
data from each user:
Name,
email address, phone number, other
contact info, user ID, device ID, purchase history, credit and
financial info including other
financial info, precise location, physical address, list of
contacts, emails or text messages, audio data, photos/videos, gameplay
content, other user content,
search and browsing history, product interaction, advertising data,
other usage data, diagnostics, health and fitness, sensitive info,
and other data types.
As
if the sheer amount of data being collected isn't enough, has the word
"other" ever looked so ominous?
People
haphazardly sign up with social media under the false assumption that
such a large, well-known company with hundreds of millions of users
would never exploit their privacy on such a grand scale, but that's
exactly why social media exists. It started in the 1990s as a way to
connect people, but when it was discovered how much information was
generated by people using social media and how much that information
was worth to advertisers amd government agencies, social media was
transformed into a gigantic data mining
industry.
Whether
you use Facebook, Instagram, Google, Threads, or whatever, you are
feeding an enormous machine vast quantities of data about you. Social
media services make it sound like they are
keeping your data safe by not selling data that is personally
identifiable, but big tech internet companies like data brokers are all
taking advantage of an unregulated loophole that allows them to merge
non-identifiable information they acquire with personal information
they already have. This allows all of them to amass enormous, detailed
profiles of people's private lives... all legally.
If you've signed up for Threads, enjoy your
time on it, but just like
all other social media platforms, you won't find me there.
New Single to
Honor Steve Meisner is Released June 28, 2023
I'm
usually elated whenever I announce the release of a new single. Under
the circumstances, however, this song's release is bittersweet as it
honors the life and legacy of our departed friend, Steve Meisner.
"Go Rest High on That Mountain"
is a beautiful, uplifting memorial song written and composed by Vince
Gill. I never had any intentions of recording a cover of it, but when
Steve passed away, I knew it would make a fitting tribute.
Steve was a fan of a song I wrote a couple years ago called "My Daddy
Lives On". He complimented me on its simple, evocative, Nashville-style
arrangement, so when it came time to produce a tribute song for him, I
knew that was the route I wanted to go.
I
began arranging and recording this song on June 4, and finished
production in the studio on June 26.
The stunningly poignant
vocal is performed by Abby Broeniman. Abby, granddaughter of the late
Dorf Kapelle bandleader Ernie Broeniman, is the vocalist who shared a
duet with Steve on my 2022 album, Escape
to Polka Paradise. Steve was a fan of Abby's singing and would
no doubt appreciate the incredible job she did on this project.
People have asked me how
to get in touch with Abby to thank her and compliment her on her
vocals, so she's given me her permission to publicly share her email
address: abbykramer61@gmail.com
Joining
Abby and me on this song are two of my fellow bandmates from Steve's
band: Jerry Bieniek and Don Hunjadi, friend and fellow recording artist
Mollie B, and Nashville-based session vocalist Craig Palmer. My thanks
to all of them and to Ted Lange for their contributions to this project.
I've covered the cost of the song's licensing, so it is free for you to
play and/or download. I also put together a video slideshow to
accompany and deliver the song. I hope the music and pictures bring you
peace and comfort as you keep the Meisner family in your thoughts and
prayers.
UPDATE JULY 2, 2023: As most of you
know, I eschew social media. As a result, I am not privy to the
reactions and feedback received by this song on Steve Meisner's
Facebook page, but friends and fellow musicians have informed me that
it's received over 10,000 plays, over 500 likes, and nearly 200
comments. I am humbled and overwhelmed by all your kind words. On
behalf of Abby, Craig, Don, Jerry, Mollie, and Ted... thank you so much!
If a Music
Retailer
Offers to Sell You an Album Copied to a USB Flash Drive June 27, 2023
A
concerned consumer of polka music recently forwarded me information
from the latest issue of a
polka music retailer's newsletter. Something seemed fishy to them, and
they wanted to run it by me for my opinion.
In
the newsletter, the retailer was
advertising CDs for sale as usual, but also specified that if you don't
want a CD, they could copy the music from any CD to a USB drive and
then ship you
the drive. Since CD players are obsolete, this can be a very valuable
service for some consumers, especially those who drive newer cars.
What
raised a red flag and triggered alarm bells, however, was the included
comment that if you order an album on a USB drive, to specify whether
or not you want them to ship out the CD as well.
If
you ever see an offer like this, ALWAYS SAY YES. It's very important you
insist the retailer ship
the CD with the USB drive, even if you have no way of playing CDs.
Here's why:
A
band can track sales of their albums, but they can't track sales of
third-party copies of their albums. If a band
sells a retailer 25 CDs, the retailer can only sell 25 CDs before they
need to order more. But if the retailer copies the band's album from CD
to USB
drive and sells the drives, the band can't track those sales. The
retailer might only buy 25 CDs, but they could potentially sell
hundreds of copies of the albums on USB without the band ever knowing.
By
insisting the CD be
included with the USB drive, you are protecting the band's copyright
by ensuring the retailer can't sell more albums than what they buy from
the band.
When
I contacted the retailer, they assured me that if a customer buys an
album
on USB and tells them to keep the CD, they will voluntarily
take one CD out of their inventory and return it to the band. I
do not personally know this retailer so I am not going to make any
assumptions, but even if they have the best of intentions, their
album-on-USB strategy, from a business perspective, has not been
implemented in the most practical way and still triggers red flags that
ought to be addressed and fixed.
The True Measure
of Meisner June 5, 2023
Over
the spring, I'd been trying to decide on a good date to make my latest
album, Escape to Polka Paradise,
available to the public via digital streaming platforms. The date I
chose, quite arbitrarily, was June 1. On that date, the album dropped
on Apple Music, Spotify, and most other major streaming platforms.
It's
a news story that never made it onto my website. Needless to say, far
more important news was breaking that day — the untimely loss of our
friend, Steve Meisner.
For
several days, my brain was in a fog that hampered everything I did, but
as the fog slowly started to lift, I thought about how the album —
which features Steve singing two songs — went live on the same day he
passed away. Was there any meaning to this coincidence?
As
I pondered these thoughts, I found that meaning in a memory that came
back to me. It was a memory of
the recording session that took place last year in May, when Steve was
at my studio recording his vocals for the album. At the time, it was
insignificant. In retrospect,
however, it defines who Steve was at his core, and needs to be shared.
Professional
studio albums incur a lot of expenses, one of which is paying the
musicians and vocalists. Escape to
Polka Paradise cost over $5,000 to produce, but, with the
exception of a small stack of CDs, not a penny of
that went to Steve Meisner. After he finished recording his vocal
tracks for the album, I tried to pay him for his services, but he
flatly refused to take any money from me.
"Tom," he said, "I don't want your money. As long you're
happy with the vocal tracks, then I'm happy."
I
thanked him profusely while still trying to jam a couple $100 bills
into his pocket, but he kept pushing my hand away.
"Steve, at the very least, can I reimburse
you for gas driving up here from Whitewater?"
"No, thanks," he sternly but
sincerely replied as
I reluctantly capitulated.
As
we were exiting the studio and getting ready to walk up the stairs, he
spied a roll of bubble wrap on the floor.
"I'll tell ya what, Tom, I'll take that
roll of bubble wrap right there. How about that?"
He
then explained how one of his grandkids [I can't remember which one]
loved bubblewrap and would have an absolute ball with it. Without
hesitating I picked up the roll and plunked it in his arms. We both
smiled and shared a laugh.
In
retrospect, that small gesture says so much about Steve Meisner. There
he was — one of the most revered titans in the history of the genre —
walking out my door with nothing but a $30 roll of bubblewrap, and
happy as a clam.
Steve
Meisner was a great musician, but his profession, quite simply, was
making people happy. His talent only defined him as a musician. What
defined him as a man was how masterfully he used that talent as a
vehicle to spread the love in his heart to others.
Booking Events
at Senior Living and Elder Care Facilities May 31, 2023 Like
most bandleaders, I lower my band's rates for senior living residences,
veterans homes, and facilities for rehabilitation, memory care, and
assisted living.
A few years ago, my drummer and I were asked to play for an Oktoberfest
party for the residents at an elder healthcare facility in Milwaukee.
While we played, however, I noticed that only a handful of residents
were ever around. All of the people milling about were younger and
dressed casual.
It turned out that we were not primarily playing for the residents — we
were playing for corporate executives and staff. It was their party,
although residents were invited. In essence, we were playing for a
corporate event, but were inadvertently bamboozled into charging our
discounted rate.
What triggered my memory of this situation is that we were recently
hired by a senior living facility to play for one of their bi-monthly
socials "for the residents." As I would normally do, I offered a
discounted rate. A couple weeks before the event, I discovered the
facility was advertising this event to the public. It turns out this
was not just another social for the residents — it was also a
promotional event for the facility.
I don't blame the facility for bamboozling us because they did not know
I was offering them a discounted rate, but by inadvertently
misrepresenting the nature of the event to me, they managed to book my
band for a price less than what I would have charged any other venue
for a public event.
The purpose of this article is to educate both elder living/healthcare
facilities and bandleaders about the importance of communicating the
true nature of an event.
Bands typically have three different rate tiers depending on the type
of event: discounted/charitable, public, and private/corporate. If a
band is playing for the residents and their families, they'll charge a
discounted rate. If they are playing for the general public, they'll
charge a public rate. If they are playing for the facility itself (such
as for a corporate staff holiday party) they'll charge a private rate.
If you are a senior living or elder care facility hiring a band for a
function, be specific about whom the event is for.
If you are a band hired to play "for the residents" of a senior living
or elder healthcare facility, make absolutely certain you are playing
for the residents before you offer your discounted rate. I will be
adding a clause to my contract mentioning the discounted rate, the
reasoning behind the discount, and asserting my right to void the
discount if the nature of the event was miscommunicated or
misrepresented during the hiring process.
Have You Gotten
a Video Deleted by YouTube or Facebook? May 15, 2023
A
follow-up to my March article on copyrights
The
Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 gave copyright holders a
standardized means of filing copyright infringement claims on the
internet. When a claim is processed and the infringing material is
removed, it's known as a "DMCA takedown." Over the years I've filed
about a half-dozen takedown requests for both my music and photos, all
of which were successful.
DMCA
takedowns are still the industry standard strategy for removing
infringing material, except the strategy bears the disadvantage of
requiring human intervention, which I'll explain.
When
social media took off in the 2000s, something became evidently clear:
the average social media user is not a copyright lawyer; they don't
understand the mechanics of unauthorized distribution. It didn't take
long for social media sites and burgeoning video sites like Facebook
and YouTube to become
flooded with copyrighted material. Whether it was footage from a live
concert or an
upload of a family singing Happy Birthday to their dog, videos
containing
copyrighted music were being uploaded at a rate that far outpaced the
rate at which DMCA takedown requests could be filed and processed by
humans. Something needed to be done to speed up the process, and that's
where systems like Content ID come in.
Content
ID is a fully automated system used by YouTube that detects copyright
infringement and takes action. Here's an oversimplified explanation of
how it works:
When
independent artists or record labels digitally distribute their
original music to YouTube, their music is submitted to the Content ID
music database. Think of this database as as being like the Library of
Congress for recorded music — it's absolutely enormous. Whenever anyone
uploads a video to YouTube, all of the music in their video
is matched against all of the music in the Content ID database to see
if any of it matches.
If
a match is detected, an automated action is taken against the person
who uploaded the infringing material. Typically, either the video is
deleted and the uploader receives a copyright strike on their account,
or ads are inserted into the video so that the copyright holder earns a
small royalty from each stream.
Other
services, such as Spotify and Facebook, also have their own content
identification systems in place.
Since
systems like Content ID are fully automated, detecting and acting on
copyright infringements has become fast and efficient, but sometimes
the systems screw up and require human intervention. People
have been known to receive erroneous copyright strikes, and sometimes
artists will receive strikes against themselves for infringing on their
own material. But for the few headaches they cause, automated systems
like Content ID are an absolute necessity in today's fast-paced social
media world.
New Single
Released! May 5, 2023
"New"
Photo of Kittling
April 8, 2023
Last week, I gathered all
my video clips of Kittling (1992-2009) and Snickers (2009-2021) and
compiled them into two seamless videos. It's something I had been
meaning to do for a long time because all the clips are fragmented
across 30 years of various video formats — VHS, AVI, MOV, and MP4.
Above is a still photo
taken from a VHS clip of Kittling when she was two years old.
Bad Drivers
Caught On (My) Camera April 2, 2023
The
internet is full of video recordings
of stupid drivers. I find those videos rather entertaining, so I
thought I'd put together my own, short video of three close calls that
I caught on my dash cam. Enjoy!
Europe's
Murderous Volksmusik Gangs April 1, 2023
Veronique
Schweigler, Switzerland's 2019 Cheese Princess, proudly brandishes her
Alpenthuggen gang affiliation
It started as a bar fight
between two musicians. Today, it's Central Europe's deadliest gang
rivalry.
In 2014, at a
tavern in the quaint Austrian village of
Schädenheijer, a disagreement over the authenticity of the
region's folk music erupted between two musicians — a local button box
player from the valley, and an Alphorn player from the mountain
settlement of Wuenzerdorf. As the argument escalated and more tavern
patrons became involved, a rift developed between the valley locals
and
the moutain visitors. It is not
known who threw the first beer, but within seconds, the tavern became a
violent and bloody battleground between the two sides. This event is
known today as
theSchädenheijer
Brawl.
Over two dozen
people were injured in the melee. One musician, clarinet
player Saška Zloblak, died after being struck in the head by a ceramic
beer stein.
Two days later,
in the nearby mountain town of Kleßergnitt,
trumpet player Florijan Mlačnik, who was not involved in the
Schädenheijer
Brawl, was gunned down
inside his barn while milking his cow. A handwritten note assumed to
have been left by the
killer said Maščevanje za
Saška! — Revenge for Saška!
Word of the
revenge murder spread quickly throughout the Alps,
echoing from
mountain to mountain and sparking increased violence between the two
growing factions. By the end of the year, ten more musicians, two
radio deejays, and a tavern owner had been slain.
Today, folk
musicians and fans throughout south-central Europe are
divided
into two warring factions: the Alpenthuggen
and theTirolerbluuds,
commonly referred to as the A-Ts and T-Bs. The A-Ts control the
mountainous high country, while the T-Bs control the riverways and
valleys.
Since the Schädenheijer
Brawl, more
than 130 members of both gangs have been killed by their rivals.
Statistically, some of the most remote, picturesque regions of
Switzerland, Austria,
and Slovenia are now the deadliest places to live on the
continent.
Schonnäu-Konigsleiter,
Austria — the murder capital of Europe
In
an early attempt to
escape the violence, people from the valleys fled to the mountains
while people from mountains fled to the valleys. It didn't work as
they all crossed paths in the foothills and ended up fighting anyway.
"What's
making things
extra complicated," said Slovenia's Director General of Police, Andrea
Valesko, "is that the T-B's gang sign is the same as waving hello. I
mean, who's the Einstein who came up with that? It's affecting our
tourism
industry. Imagine innocently waving to a passing goat herder while
visiting Switzerland and getting your head blown off. That actually
happened last year."
"Wait...
maybe don't
print that last part," Valesko added.
The
gang rivalry has changed the way many people in south-central Europe
live. Gun and ammunition
sales in and around the Alps have increased 800% over the last five
years. As soon as children are old enough to churn butter, they are
sent to the local armory for weapons training. One out of every four
haystacks conceals
a machine gun nest. Residents have installed metal bars on the doors
and
windows of their chalets. Cows are not allowed to graze outside past
their 7pm curfew.
In
the wake of the
increased gang rivalry, some residents have
diversified to meet the needs of their fellow gang affiliates. Franc
Horvat, 62, an accordion teacher from Odjušova,
Slovenia, became a certified firearms instructor. He offers his
students accordion lessons followed by semi-automatic weapons and
hand-to-hand combat training.
"We
need to raise our
children on authentic folk music. Real
music. Not that dang blasted crap the A-Ts play," exclaimed Horvat
while flashing the Tirolerbluuds gang sign. "And we need to train these
kids to kill the A-Ts so we can finally live in peace."
Anja
(14) with her accordion/firearms instructor, Franc Horvat
Goodwill
Now Nation's #1 Polka Music Retailer
April 1, 2023
It wasn't that long ago
polka albums were flying off the shelves of retailers like Rod's Music
and T.K Frank's Polka Records. It was the heyday of polka album sales
when vendors competed for table space and online shops
updated their websites.
Many retailers have since
folded, but one has picked up where they left off: Goodwill. Ask any
polka enthusiast where they buy their music, and they'll all mention
Goodwill. It may sound prestigious to have a nationwide store handling
the bulk of
the country's polka album sales, however, it comes with a catch.
"When
I heard Goodwill was such a big retailer of polka music, I stopped in
with a box of my band's CDs and asked what they were paying,"
said Wisconsin musician Emil "Skip" Dallman of the Dallman Dutchmen.
"The kid
behind the counter just looked at me
funny and handed me a donation slip."
$0.00.
That's the current wholesale album price Goodwill is paying to polka
bands.
"The
distribution has been excellent, though," added Dallman. "We were able
to get our albums in every Goodwill store between Cedarburg and
Kenosha,
and it only cost us about seventy bucks in gas."
Julie Andrews
Burns to Death; Mollie B in Custody April 1, 2023
The Brentwood,
California residence of Dame Julie Andrews engulfed in
flames
The world's most renown
musical songstress, Julie Andrews, 87, was tragically killed yesterday
after allegedly being set on fire by polka star Mollie Busta,
known professionally as "Mollie B". Surveillance video obtained
by police shows Busta entering Andrews' residence in Brentwood, CA on
the
evening of March 31. She confronted Andrews, doused her with
gasoline, threw a lit match on
her, and fled the residence.
Busta was identified in
the video by a polka fan working in the Brentwood police department.
She was spotted and
arrested in Santa Monica later that evening. Busta is being held
without
bail at the Los Angeles Celebrity Detention Spa & Resort pending
charges.
"At this time, we are
trying to come up with the appropriate charges, but new information
discovered during our investigation is making this rather difficult,"
said Los Angeles County Sheriff, Timothy Guerrero.
The new information is a
text message on a mobile phone which Busta voluntarily gave to
authorities. The text is part of a conversation with musician Tom
Brusky of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. In the conversation, Busta
and Brusky appear to be discussing the vocal style in which Busta
should sing one of Brusky's music productions. Guerrero is
particularly focused on what is believed to be an auto-corrected typo:
"In this particular
instance," explained Guerrero, "it's highly unlikely we will
pursue homicide charges. Or arson charges for that matter. It's kind of
obvious
Tom Brusky's instruction to Mollie was to emulate Julie Andrews, not
immolate her. It's just a very sad, tragic misunderstanding caused by a
phone app."
We reached out to Los
Angeles District Attorney Christine Walker to ask whether or not she
intends to go easy on Mollie's charges based on the auto-corrected
typo. Walker replied
via text:
—
Yes, these
kinds of thongs harpoon all the time. We'll mosh likely be charring Ms.
Buster with 3rd Decree Négligée Engenderment for failure
to recognize the auto-corrected typo. That's a Class E misdemeanor
perishable by up to a maxivan fine of $150 and 40 hours of
commune tea servants. —
Although
the death of
Julie Andrews exemplifies the potential danger of auto-corrected
texting, the
most horrific auto-corrected typo on record occured shortly before
Christmas in 2015, when the children at Sunnyview Day Care in
Pocatello, Idaho were taken to the local community center to
have their pictures taken with Satan.
Aiden Laravee, 4, thought he was going to the Pocatello Community
Center to see Santa.
Artificial Intelligence and Music March 31, 2022
AI has
infiltrated the music industry, but it is not welcome in my studio
My
last article was motivated by all the buzz regarding the uncharted
waters of copyrighting artificially-created material. Artificial
intelligence, commonly abbreviated AI, is a very hot topic in music
forums lately.
Chances
are you don't know how much AI has infiltrated your life over just the
past two years. More and more of the content you're seeing and hearing
every day — music, art, films, photos, advertising, articles — is being
artificially created.
The
benefits to AI creation are speed and cost. They days of laboring over
writing music and lyrics, commissioning artists and photographers, and
hiring journalists to create fillers for newspapers are numbered. More
and more people in these industries are embracing AI to speed up their
workflow and cut labor expenses.
AI
has already infested the music industry to the point that none of us
can be certain if the music we're hearing behind a TV commercial was
created entirely by a human, created by a human with the aid of AI
software, or
created entirely by AI software. AI-generated pop songs have already
been playing on the radio for several years. Library music tracks – the
generic, cookie-cutter instrumentals you often hear behind videos – are
being churned out by AI-assisted producers.
None
of this really affects me because music is both an art and an industry,
and I am an artist. Just like robots replaced assembly line
workers in the auto industry, over the next ten years, AI will replace
many of the musicians who currently make a living producing music for
clients, such TV/radio producers and video game developers. I'm not
involved in that section of the industry. In the
coming years, those clients will begin employing AI software to
generate the music they need because AI doesn't ask for contracts,
licensing fees, or royalties. It will put a lot of industry musicians
out of work, but AI will never prevent artists from creating.
The
one thing that bothers me about AI is that it's being used as a crutch
by creatively-challenged musicians to "create" new songs. The world has
always been filled with musicians, and music production was
traditionally a rather expensive endeavor reserved for only those who
took it seriously. Over the past twenty years, however, the drop in the
cost of computer technology paved the way for all the world's
fame-starved teenagers to create laptop-based music production studios
in their bedrooms. With no musical training whatsoever, these bedroom
producers can download and splice together pre-fabricated beats and
call themselves music producers. AI is advancing this phenomena by
creating not just music for them, but lyrics as well.
Music
AI, just like pre-fabbed beats and loops, will never be welcome in my
studio because I take pride in calling myself a songwriter. I work the
old-school way — I compose music with a piano and write lyrics with a
pen and paper, aided by nothing more than a thesaurus. I use the latest
virtual instrument synth and sample technology as tools to produce
music, but you can rest assured my original songs and arrangements are,
and will always be, products of the neurons firing in my frontal
cortex... the way music's been created since the beginning of time.
A Common
Misunderstanding About Copyrights March 30, 2022
One
of my favorite pastimes is watching Live
on Patrol, a YouTube channel run by the Ramsey County
Sheriff's Office in St. Paul, Minnesota. They livestream themselves on
patrol several times a week. I believe they are the only law
enforcement department currently livestreaming, but for the past five
years, a police officer from a small Midwestern city also livestreamed
his patrols. One of his hallmarks was singing, albeit terribly, while
patrolling. He'd crank up his iPod over his car's stereo system and
croon away as if no one were listening.
Everyone
got a kick out of his vocally-challenged livestreams, except he kept on
running into problems with Facebook shutting his streams down for
violating song copyrights. After a while, he got smart and contacted
the bands whose music he wanted to play. He'd get their permission to
play their music, and use that permission to successfully appeal
Facebook's actions and get his deleted videos reinstated.
But
there was something he did that annoyed me much more than his singing:
When he ranted about Facebook pulling down his videos, he would tell
his audience that it was okay for them to play copyrighted music over
the internet as long as they weren't making money from it.
This
is a very common misconception about copyrights. A copyright violation
is not determined by whether or not money changes hands. A copyright is
purely about distribution. It's literally the right to make a copy of something. When you
distribute someone else's copyrighted material without their
permission, even if you're not making any money from the distribution,
you're still potentially harming the copyright holder.
Here's
a simplified analogy to explain this harm:
Let's
say you're a photographer and you've just set up a kiosk to sell copies
of your photographs. Then someone else sets up a kiosk right next to
yours, fills it with unauthorized photocopies of your photographs, and
instead
of charging for them, gives them away for free. So now you're going to
lose an entire day's worth of kiosk sales because the person next to
you is giving away all your photos for free.
Even
though they're not making any money, should they be allowed to tank
your sales like that? Of course not. And that's why copyrights exist.
Song
copyrights work the same way as the photo copyrights above. When you
play someone else's copyrighted song on your podcast or social media
page without permission or licensing, you are assuming control over the
distribution of that song. Instead of fans getting the song through
authorized channels which pay the artist/publisher royalties, they can
now get the song from you for free and the artist/publisher gets
nothing. That doesn't seem right, does it?
Another
common and often related misconception about copyrights is that any
non-profitable
distribution of copyrighted material, like the kind mentioned above, is
protected under the Fair Use doctrine. In a nut
shell, the Fair Use doctrine upholds the distribution of copyrighted
material, but only under a few specific conditions. For example, if a
news network does a news segment about a song, Fair Use upholds
their right to broadcast a snippet of that song in their segment. If a
music university professor discusses a particular song during a
lecture, Fair Use upholds his right to play portions of that song for
his students. If a parodist pokes fun at a song by creating a lyrically
funny version of it, Fair Use may uphold his right to share that
version.
Generally
speaking, as long as the distributor's commentary or criticism is
focused specifically on the song itself (e.g. dissection of the chord
structure, discussion of the song's history) and it's very clear they are not using the
song for any other purpose or agenda (e.g. background music for a
personal video, promotion of themselves or other products) their
distribution is
more likely to be upheld by Fair Use. But Fair Use is not a guaranteed
shield of protection against a lawsuit. It's merely a legal defense
that may be used in the event of a lawsuit.
Questions
like these come up every now and then in the internet forums to which I
belong. I find these business-oriented topics to be much more
fascinating than the usual, "What's the best reverb plugin?" [a
question typically followed by 200 responses... all of them different.]
I'm not a lawyer by any stretch of the imagination, but as a recording
musician, I have to educate myself about these topics. Hopefully the
knowledge I learn can help you in some way.
At
some point later this year, I will revisit the copyright topic, but the
focus will be on DMCA takedowns and online platforms utilizing Content
ID and automated copyright strikes.
Albums To Be
Pulled From YouTube March 5, 2022
I
used to earn a royalty for every stream of my music on
YouTube. But then, around last June, something changed; I stopped
getting paid for over half
of my music's streams. I recently contacted my digital distributor for
an
explanation, but they never replied. Over the following month, I sent
them two reminders to reply and opened a second support ticket, but I
never heard from them.
My
distributor's reluctance to address the issue has given me cause for
concern. Profits seem to be getting skimmed out of my pocket which
is a serious breach of ethics, so I'm going to start pulling my music
off
the service. As soon as I can make it happen, my 2016 album The
Holidays in Music, and my 2018 album Positively
Polka, will be deleted from YouTube.
UPDATE
March 9:
Both
albums have been succesfully removed from YouTube. I am thinking about
eventually removing the rest of my music from the service as well, but
that leaves
me in between a rock and hard place. YouTube
is the world's biggest
platform for music — if you have an album or single out, people expect
to find it on YouTube. By
taking my music off YouTube, I'll stop YouTube from taking advantage of
me, but it will also make my music less discoverable.
Later
this spring, I will be digitally distributing my 2022 album, Escape to Polka Paradise. It will
be distributed to all the major platforms except YouTube, iHeart Radio,
and TikTok. [The reason I no longer distribute my music to iHeart Radio
is explained in this article. TikTok employs
a non-standard model of paying streaming royalties which also takes
advantage of artists.]